In the
last contest I entered, there was a moment where I stood in a flock of writers
all chatting loudly at the seminar (it’s paradoxical to see writers bloom boisterously
at these get-togethers because they’re otherwise quiet loners) and I tracked
down Joanne, one of the coordinators. She handed me my scored entries then
said, “Hold on while I find your critique sheets.”
I let
her know, “I didn’t sign up for those. Just needed to find out if I won or
not.” My first ten pages came back with something like a 92 which ranked pretty
well, but didn’t get me finalist.
Jaw
nearly unhinging in her surprise, Joanne asked, “You don’t want to see what the
evaluators had to say?”
“Do you
think if I changed it to whatever they suggested someone will accept my
manuscript?”
She gave
me a smile mingled with scolding and mischief. “It’s not as simple as that you
know it.”
“Plus,
why would I pay extra for their feedback when I’ve spent months in critique groups
getting critiqued to death for free?”
She
didn’t have an answer. And apparently, I’m the only scribe in history who opted
out of these hell-of-a-deal critiques, rebel that I am.
If my
whimsical logic in the above situation resonates with you, the rest of this
posting will be down your alley. Otherwise, you’ll more than likely deem me as
a cheapskate and a crabapple. Rest assured, I’m not grumpy, but cheap…you
betcha.
So, in
said case, my manuscript didn’t even reach the finals which are judged by a
panel of editors and agents. I graciously accepted that. By all means, it’s good
exposure if you make it to the finals. Now…keep in mind that comprising the
team of evaluators in a typical conference contest is a mixed bag, a lot of
non-published authors, newbies—some who may not even stick with the pursuit to
publication once they find out how hard it is, and usually a few who have
gotten some independent deals. Maybe…maybe…
a couple of writers who have New York pubs join the cast, but this is rare
because they’re taxed enough with trying to stay in that status by marketing
and meeting deadlines. In other words, if you’re a member of that organization
hosting the cook off, the evaluators are people in your same league. It is ludicrous to pay for feedback from
your peers yet again. Everybody’s got an opinion and the most polished
pages read by fresh eyes will continue to gather ‘suggestions for change’ if
you let it snowball.
As for
the contest itself, bang-for-the-buck evaluation, I would suggest that every
writer enter at least one or two, then evaluate whether to do them anymore. Contests
are a lot of work for those who run them and, provided that the entry fee is
around $30, they’re a reasonable service. I don’t recommend entry because it
will get you a book deal. Rather, you try it out for education.
An NYT Bestselling author I know confided to me once,
“Winning contests will get you good at winning contests.”
Take
that as you wish, but I have indeed noticed that a lot of acquaintances who are
pretty sharp writers and recent contest winners are doing just that, winning,
but not much else. Professional contacts are being made I’m sure, but I’m still
crossing my fingers for them that something significant will break through. Maybe
it’s because the industry is changing so drastically. 10 years ago, winning competitions
appeared to open doors a little better. I have a couple of author pals who
scored NY book deals back in the day after claiming a blue ribbon, but again,
recently, I haven’t heard any ground-shaking news. Please feel free to share if
you know of anyone snagging a contract with the big houses directly from taking
first prize.
Of
course, to each their own. There are people out there who adore a friendly
challenge and just take this sort of thing in stride with the business.
However, if you’re fairly new to the mission of publication, and think contests
in some way are a fast track, cool your jets. Writing world is plenty
competitive in every path. Enter one of these and you’ll experience it up
close.
Above
all, make sure that you are also sending your work to agents and publishers
with open door submission policies. Believe it or not, that’s how most of my entourage
with book deals made it.Next and final installment : The Big Wrap Up - The Best Advice I Ever Got at a Conference
Gusto
1 comment:
I agree, Gusto! Well written!
Everyone has an opinion, but not all opinions belong in your work. Sure, some will most likely write in and take issue with what you've said, and point out all the positives to contests, and that's fine, but in my experience, no, haven't seen any earth-shattering results, either. The way I look at it, you can either write for/toward contest entry or write to publish--nothing "wrong" with either, but understand what you're doing. Contests don't guarantee you publication, and in today's New Indie World, there are definitely other options!
And I love your statement about " Plus, why would I pay extra for their feedback when I’ve spent months in critique groups getting critiqued to death for free?" if you belong to critique groups, and gaining such a "look" from that person tells me much about the "traditional mindset" of that person...and "traditional" is not what I'm (and I'm sure many others) about. I love breaking rules and simply don't like being told what to do, what's acceptable. I've found critique groups and contests too "set in their ways" too traditional about "what must be and must not be" in mss and their execution. What must be done up front, in the middle, at the end. To me, if a story "works," who cares how it's constructed...if the construction didn't work, then the story didn't work. Flashbacks have always bugged my groups, now, everyone's doing them.
Post a Comment